Disputation on the Power & Efficacy of Nuclesr Energy vs LENR
Disputation on the Power & Efficacy of Nuclear Energy vs LENR
A half century ago,
this tract would have been printed by an early version of the Gutenberg press
and read to congregations on a Sunday morning. Today's author makes it instantaneously
available to a few alert readers around the world on screens in their own homes
and in their own language.
Virtual nailing of the piece
on a few pious doors across Europe may be more news worthy than New Year’s
marches.
With the glut of
advertisements, entertainment and opinion in modern media, we have to ask, "to what effect are both factual and
hyped news?" Actually, big media being engaged in both, are all-powerful
in influencing consumer decisions and in policy making. They are the gatekeepers
of what technology and energy news gets included in daily press and screened
news releases.
Here’s an example from major science and technology journal: MIT
article:" ...transforming the energy system would take, not the
next three decades, but nearly the next four centuries.”---------------------------------------0------------------------------------------
Broad introduction
of LENR should both corral the increase in Co2 emissions, and lower (trough
phase-out) the risks of old nuclear reactors –all within a couple of decades.
.
Note:
The balance of this article was inadvertently deleted.
IF A READER HAPPENED TO HAVE DOWNLOADED a later version of the full article, kindly leave a comment. Thanks, JD
.
Comments
Post a Comment